as articles by review is a lengthy process, candidates will often in this process because the review of the in-depth and not a clue, and into some errors and difficulty. Articles by political subjects, this phenomenon is more common. From Wan Xuehai text by understanding to of candidates review situation view, candidates in political of review thought Shang most easy committed following three large errors, following on for such of three a errors together to analysis about causes and rescue measures:
errors a: disunity type
errors analysis: this review method, to review of focus placed in on each trivial of knowledge points of review Shang, lack on knowledge system of macro, and overall sexual grasp. Students who take this review it is difficult to cope with a more flexible and comprehensive subject. Articles by topic now, increased focus on flexibility and comprehensive on the proposition, more attention to examine candidates for solid grasp of knowledge. Who at the time of review does not establish a very good knowledge of the system, but stays on the scattered grasp of knowledge, it is very difficult to adapt to the ideas of articles by proposition today.
the correct review should be to achieve such an effect: candidates saw the question, whether it is to analyze the problem selection, analysis, in the brain has a complete set of logical system and corresponding can quickly determine the knowledge of the problems involved are in the first few sections of the chapter, and can further think of this knowledge and some other associated points.
strategies: candidates throughout the review process should strive to always keep the knowledge of the logical structure of the system have a clear grasp. Wan Xuehai articles by counselling the teachers proposed 2012 years reviewing each course, the candidate of, preferably first directory of skillfully grasping this course towards first put down the directory structure of the section. And in the entire review process, regardless of the knowledge review to not only learn the knowledge itself, but also focus on thinking, grasping the knowledge points and other points of knowledge before and after, and links with other chapters on the logic, only by the thought of knowledge review to be live.
myth II: a haystack-
error analysis: some students believe that have a variety of reference books can achieve the most comprehensive effect in his hand, often at the same time take a move in chess the content of similar service book. Total word count for all reference books up to many millions of words, candidates are required to invest a lot of time to finished reviewing. But because of the tight schedule, task, candidates are difficult to devote sufficient time and effort to be thorough these books. Often just look about, it is difficult to achieve the degree of flexibility.
strategies: Wan Xuehai recommends 2012 candidates should select one or two books, invest sufficient time and effort to thoroughly that one or two books. "Reading a book is better than reading ten books. "Provided that the candidates are required to select a high quality counselling.
myth three: random-
error analysis: review of review of this candidate who often lack a precise plan. At the time of review, there is no specific time requirements, for example, should be in each month, and even daily progress to what extent. And if you do not have a precise plan, when the review will consciously or unconsciously into lax. Methods of reviewing such a freedom-although it has its benefits, but less efficient to review of the overall point of view.
strategies: Wan Xuehai proposed 2012 years review of each candidate to draw up a strict plan, provides good every day or even every one-hour review progress, like the development of operational plans, in accordance with the time of reservation, complete the booking task, step by step to review. According to me these years students experience, I suggest the candidate members in the review process as a whole, on every subject to review at least four times. In accordance with the laws of memory, the first time may make you skilled knowledge 30% content, second times review can make you grasp the knowledge content of 50%, the third times it can make you grasp the knowledge content of 70%, the fourth time to review you will be able to achieve the master 90% examination content results.
this several points above hope 2012 articles by students of note, correct their problems in a timely manner in the course of the review. I believe Members will all political good review on this basis, eventually achieving excellent results.
